News

EUROPEAN Commission plans to increase taxes on digital firms risk undermining growth and could stifle global efforts to find common solutions to tax issue, US companies operating in the EU said yesterday.

The comments echo the Irish Government’s position, which is opposed to the proposals that would see some online companies with little or no physical presence in many EU member states taxed based on their turnover, rather than profits.

Critics have said that online firms such as Google or Facebook pay too little tax in the EU by re-routing most their profits to low-rate countries, such as Luxembourg or Ireland.

Frustrated by how long it is taking the world’s rich nations to reach a deal on how to fairly tax digital giants, the EU has threatened to move ahead alone with a tax on turnover, or with other short or long-term measures.
“Unilateral action by the EU would seriously undermine international efforts to address tax issues,” Susan Danger, head of the American Chamber of Commerce to the EU (AmCham EU), said.

AmCham EU said a turnover tax, as proposed by France and backed by other large EU countries, would reduce investment, hit jobs and penalise start-ups, low-margin and loss-making companies. Current rules exempt loss-making firms from paying taxes.
A report by EU lawmaker Paul Tang said the US online retailer Amazon, which has its EU tax residence in Luxembourg, had been mostly exempted from taxes in the 2013-2015 period because it did not make profits.

The EU is also considering more structural measures to change the way companies are taxed, so that levies could be raised when they have a “virtual” platform in a country, and not only a physical presence.
Changes to existing rules could be added to a review of corporate tax rules currently under debate in the EU Parliament, the Commission said.

AmCham EU also criticised the initiative for a common tax base in the 28-country bloc, saying the move could “adversely affect EU competitiveness and growth if it is not in line with internationally agreed rules”. (Reuters)

Article Source: http://tinyurl.com/kbwqb42